Archive for October, 2012|Monthly archive page
More on Content Marketing
Filed under: Marketing Thoughts | Tags: b2b, Budget, content, education, funnel, lead nurturing, Marketing, metrics, social media
Comments (1)
You can’t look at any major marketing magazine, blog or website without seeing some talk about Content Marketing. Content creation takes up a good chunk of my time and I’m always interested in best practices and research findings.
Here’s a smattering of recent articles I found particularly interesting:
- B2B article: Content ascends to marketing throne by John Obrecht – one of the things I like is that John points out (as I have in earlier blog articles) that content marketing isn’t new. It’s been around for decades. Now it’s becoming more of coordinated effort with process discipline.
- Another B2B article, this one by Christopher Hosford, entitled Heavy-duty content marketers a breed apart. This article exhibits some recent research findings including challenges content marketers are facing.
- A report (in slide format) from the Content Marketing Institute and MarketingProfs called B2B Content Marketing: 2013 Benchmarks, Budget and Trends – North America. Some really interesting findings and insights here. Well worth the look.
- Lastly, an Eloqua blog article by Jesse Noyes titled More marketers spend on content, fewer know if it’s working. This is a take on the item above.
Here’s one of the charts I really liked from the Eloqua blog:
I’m sure we will continue to see content marketing as a discipline evolve and expand as we move into 2013 and beyond.
Marketing is Dead – or Not
Filed under: Marketing Thoughts, Rants & Raves | Tags: Marketing, sales, social media
Comments (2)
Ya just gotta love headlines for a blog article like this one:
From the Harvard Business Review, this blog by Bill Lee argues that “traditional” marketing is dead. Of course, I really think his headline is mostly for provocative purposes and to drive readership and stir passion. And you know what? It worked! Just look at the hundreds of comments already submitted. A very interesting read for a Marketing aficionado – although I did lose interest at about comment 50.
But, getting back to Bill’s article, I did find some of it valid – and much of it not so much. Here are my thoughts:
- Point #1:
“Traditional marketing — including advertising, public relations, branding and corporate communications — is dead”
Obviously, this is just an opening statement and (hopefully) Bill really isn’t that dumb. These modes of communications are still valid and, depending on your audience (B2B or B2C) and industry (for B2B), still incredibly important. Also, in the B2B world, your audience isn’t just customers and prospects. It may also be investors, potential employees, etc. And for these audiences, these channels often work well. Not a valid statement – even a stupid one.
- Point #2:
“…CEOs have lost all patience. In a devastating 2011 study of 600 CEOs and decision makers by the London-based Fournaise Marketing Group, 73% of them said that CMOs lack business credibility and the ability to generate sufficient business growth, 72% are tired of being asked for money without explaining how it will generate increased business, and 77% have had it with all the talk about brand equity that can’t be linked to actual firm equity or any other recognized financial metric.”
Now this (although I haven’t checked the numbers and validity of the study) does make a little sense to me. I have seen a lack of some CMOs understanding the business and using “branding” as a catch-all for wasteful and unmeasured activities. However, I don’t think it’s nearly as widespread or dire as this so-called study reports.
- Point #3:
“Third, in today’s increasingly social media-infused environment, traditional marketing and sales not only doesn’t work so well, it doesn’t make sense. When you try to extend traditional marketing logic into the world of social media, it simply doesn’t work.”
Wrong. And wrong in SO many ways, I’m not even sure where to begin. I guess a good first start would be to point out any of the many companies (IBM, Cisco, Eloqua, HubSpot, etc.) who leverage both “traditional” and social media well. I think I could write my PhD dissertation on this. And this is where Bill goes over the line from “scandalous” headline to get readers to downright stupidity.
- Point #4:
“In fact, this last is a bit of a red herring, because traditional marketing isn’t really working anywhere.”
OK, well Bill, it is working very well for me. Along with all the new arrows I have in my quiver including social media. Wrong again.
From this point on, the article actually gets better. And touches on many “traditional” marketing techniques to get there. Among them are:
- Restore community marketing – remember all those user groups many of us already do?
- Find your customer influencers – duh, all talented sales and marketing teams look for power and influence – and always have
- Help them build social capital – what he means by this is “customer champion.” Again, see bullet above. Been doing this for decades.
- Get your customer advocates involved in the solution you provide – again, same as the two bullets above. And been doing it for decades.
When it comes right down to it, this whole new “social media” and “inbound” marketing thing is nothing more than a new (sometimes better) way of doing what marketing has always done.
Comments are welcome, as always!
Email Marketing – basic metrics review
Filed under: Marketing Thoughts | Tags: automation, email, metrics
Leave a comment
The recent (October 2012) issue of Target Marketing had a nice, short article reviewing the basic metrics used in email marketing. It’s a nice, concise review of stats many of us use to measure the effectiveness of our email campaigns. Worth the quick read.